Header for print stylesheet
Go

Description of risks as reported in the Annual Report 2007

The following section contains a selection of important risks that have been identified and for the management of which strategies, controls and/or mitigating measures have been put in place as part of our risk-management practices. They nevertheless involve uncertainties that may lead to the actual results differing from those projected. There may also be current risks that the company has not yet fully assessed and that are currently qualified as “minor” but that could have material impact on the company’s performance at a later stage. The company’s risk-management and internal-control system has been designed to signal and respond to these developments on time, but 100% assurance can never be achieved, of course.

Generic risks

Macro-economic trends
Being a global company, DSM is subject to the usual business risks associated with macroeconomic trends and events. The projected results from the Vision 2010 are sensitive for deviations from the assumed and defined economic scenario on which the strategy is based.

General market developments
DSM operates in many different business segments with contingent risk profiles reflecting the different business environments, the diverse nature of the businesses and the distinctive competitive positions those businesses target for. DSM’s Vision 2010 aims at further reducing the cyclical element, but a substantial portion of its activities may experience material fluctuation in sales and results due to changes in general market conditions, supply-driven overcapacity, economic conditions, currency exchange rate fluctuations or other factors.

Low-cost competition
Counteracting the influence of low-cost competitors and seizing opportunities in low-cost areas (especially China) is one of the centerpieces of DSM’s strategy. There is always a risk, however, that such low-cost competitors penetrate in DSM’s core markets.

Political risks
DSM has subsidiaries in more than 45 countries. These subsidiaries can be exposed to changes in government regulations and potentially unfavorable political developments that might hamper the exploitation of certain opportunities or might impair the value of the local business.

Currency risks and interest risk
All DSM sales that are priced in currencies other than the euro are subject to economic transaction and/or translation risks that may significantly impact on the financial results, as the company’s reporting unit is the euro.

DSM’s aim is to mitigate its currency exposure by developing sales in certain regions, through product mix improvements, by focusing manufacturing activities and through increased dollar-based purchasing. However, these ‘natural hedges’ are never fully balanced. The volatility of the US dollar in relation to the euro and the Swiss franc can have a significant impact on the company’s results. Although the production base still has its center of gravity in Europe, a large portion of DSM’s product sales are in US dollars or are based on US-dollar-denominated world-market prices. Consequently, from a currency perspective there is a mismatch between revenue and costs. In the 2007 business mix a 1% change in the euro-US dollar rate and the US dollar-Swiss franc rate has on aggregate a € 8 -10 million impact on gross margin level (=sales minus variable costs). Fluctuations in the relative values of other currencies (such as the yen or the pound sterling) have a limited impact on DSM’s results.

DSM companies are obliged to hedge their open currency positions via the DSM In-house Bank in order to protect the operating result against effects of currency fluctuations. Only under strict conditions are DSM companies allowed to hedge firm commitments in order to protect the cash flow of the contract value against currency fluctuations. Hedging of forecast transactions is only allowed after the approval of the Managing Board.

In 2007 a new long term foreign currency transaction hedging strategy has been approved by the Managing Board. The new strategy follows a systematic, risk management oriented approach. Based on the optimal return-risk ratio in the last 17 years DSM decided that a risk appetite of 50% is appropriate and consequently DSM hedges 50% of the risk. DSM will follow this hedging strategy for the US dollar transaction exposure. Each year DSM will determine if currencies other than the US dollar have material impact on the result and, if so, will follow the same approach for these currencies. For 2008 the Japanese yen was added. The US dollar and Japanese yen together determine around 93% of the total foreign currency transaction exposure of DSM. End of 2007 DSM has hedged 50% of the US dollar and Japanese yen transaction exposure in 2008.

Due to the fact that a portion of the borrowings are floating interest bearing, fluctuations in the interest rates have an impact on the net result. The impact on the DSM result is capped by the company’s policy of not allowing the floating interest position to exceed 60% of net debt.

Risks of derivatives used for hedging purposes
DSM uses financial derivatives to hedge various currency and interest rate risks. Under IFRS, all derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities. In line with IAS 39 financial derivatives are recognized at fair value. Changes in fair value go to the income statement either contemporaneously or, if hedge accounting is applied, at the moment that the hedged item impacts on the income statement. These changes normally consist of a currency and an interest rate component. To limit the volatility deriving from the use of derivatives, hedge accounting is applied in certain cases. Hedge accounting is only allowed under strict conditions, which are different per hedge type.

DSM applies the following hedge accounting models: fair value hedge accounting, cash flow hedge accounting and net investment hedge accounting.

The goal of a fair value hedge is to fix the value of an asset/liability (hedged item). Changes in fair value of a designated derivative that is highly effective as a fair value hedge, together with the change in fair value of the corresponding asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk, are included directly in earnings. So both fair value changes are offset in the income statement.

The goal of a cash flow hedge is to limit the variability of highly probable future cash flows due to foreign currency or interest rate movements. Changes in fair value of a designated derivative that is highly effective as a cash flow hedge are included in equity and reclassified into income in the same period during which the hedged forecast cash flow affects income. In this way volatility in the income statement is avoided.

The goal of a net investment hedge is to fix the value of an investment in a foreign entity. Changes in fair value of a designated derivative that is highly effective as a net investment hedge are included in equity. So volatility of the hedged part of the net investment is offset in equity.

Under IFRS hedge accounting through combined derivatives is not allowed. For this reason DSM has chosen to hedge the interest and foreign currency risk with separate derivatives and not to use combined derivatives to hedge both risks.

Any ineffectiveness of hedges is reflected directly in income. DSM aims to mitigate these risks by closely monitoring the effectiveness of the hedges through effectiveness testing. Ineffectiveness only occurs when fair value changes of the hedging instrument compared to fair value changes of the underlying risk are outside an 80 – 125 % bandwidth. There was no material ineffectiveness in relation to these hedges in 2007. 

Strategic risks

Acquisitions, disposals and joint ventures
The success of DSM’s strategy is partly dependent on the company’s ability to spot and implement opportunities for acquisitions, disposals and joint ventures. Risks in this field are connected to the company’s failure to identify relevant acquisitions or alliances, or its failure to do so in time, or its lack of success in bid processes or in the integration of acquired businesses needed to safeguard its path of growth. DSM uses joint ventures and other strategic alliances whenever it is beneficial to do so (for example to combine strengths and to share investments and inherent risks). Although joint ventures and strategic alliances are always intended to add value, situations can arise that result in a conflict of interests that could potentially damage the business.

Innovation (new markets, products and technologies)
In its Vision 2010 strategy, DSM is increasing its focus on innovation in order to develop new technologies and products and explore new markets. To this end, the company will strengthen its market intelligence and enhance its market and customer orientation. Nevertheless, the actual developments in the targeted markets, the speed with which new products and technologies are accepted and the emergence of new competition will always constitute risks to the success of the chosen strategy.

Within DSM’s strategy there is extra focus on innovation. A multitude of actions are being taken to ensure success in the R&D and market development processes. There is a risk that goals nevertheless will not be achieved and that the company will have to abandon a project on which it has already spent substantial sums of money. The company may reach a point where its overall sales volume does not justify the company’s R&D expenditure.

Ability to attract and retain people
DSM’s ability to retain highly specialized and committed technical staff as well as talented staff working in sales, R&D, manufacturing, finance, general management and human resources is critical to the company’s future success. Within the limits of its strategic direction, the company is making huge and ongoing efforts are directed to managing the required processes. The company may have to adjust the timing of its growth path, due to constraints or opportunities in this field.

Organizational and cultural risks
The shift in strategy causes new demands on the organization and the attitude of the employees. Although adjustments to the organization have been implemented and programs are in place to create the outside-in focused view that is needed, decision processes may still be too slow and the entrepreneurial spirit still not sufficient.

Specific risks

Corporate reputation risks
Any failure by any of its business units to meet production safety, social, environmental and/or ethical standards could harm DSM’s corporate reputation and thereby impact on its business and results. DSM values such as good corporate citizenship, open communication and transparency should reasonably assure appropriate employee conduct. Moreover, the company mitigates its reputation risk by making substantial efforts to reduce the probability that any of its units fails to comply with internal requirements and/or external laws and regulations.

Customer risks
The company makes considerable efforts to delight its customers. Compliance with customer agreements and commitments is measured regularly. Appropriate process and product quality checks and balances are in place to mitigate the risk of non-compliance with customers’ and with DSM’s sales conditions. Nevertheless it cannot be totally excluded that issues in this area could arise.

No DSM customer represents more than 3% of DSM’s total sales.

Production-process risks
DSM tries to mitigate production process risks by spreading production where possible, but concentration is necessary in order to achieve economies of scale. The design of any new facilities and/or production processes is required to include state-of-the-art safety and security facilities. Plants are regularly and systematically inspected against predefined risk and engineering standards. Nevertheless, certain risks and the degree to which safety, health and environmental elements are managed may not always be sufficiently well known.

Raw material / energy price and availability risks
It may not always be possible to off-set the effect of raw material and energy price increases by adaptations in sales prices. Although single source situations are avoided as much as possible, the risk of incidental shortages of raw materials cannot be completely excluded. 

Product-liability risks
As a result of the progress made towards DSM’s current corporate goals following from the Vision 2010 strategy, the company’s product portfolio has shifted and is still shifting. This has been accompanied by a corresponding shift in DSM’s risk profile. DSM is aware of this ongoing process. From a product-liability point of view the life-science business is more exposed than other businesses. This holds in particular for the pharmaceutical industry, which today has to face the situation that certain product liability exposures cannot be insured against, or only at prohibitively high costs and very high retentions. To protect itself against these risks, DSM has put in place highly demanding process and product requirements and is putting in a great deal of effort on an ongoing basis to assure that all its units comply with internal and external regulatory requirements (e.g. FDA).

Non-insurable risks
Global insurance policies are in place to reduce the risk of damage to property, business interruption loss and general liability exposures, including the liability risks related to the products produced. Especially the ongoing change in the product portfolio makes product liability an issue that needs careful monitoring. At the moment, none of the products in DSM’s total portfolio is excluded from cover under our corporate insurance programs. Uninsured losses in 2007 for any one incident will not exceed about €30 million per occurrence with an annual aggregate maximum of €45 million, the possible excess being transferred to external insurers.

ICT risks
In order to control potential ICT risks DSM employs a policy of using the latest proven hardware and software solutions. Group-wide, DSM works with integrated and standardized ICT infrastructures, back-up, encoding and encryption systems, replicated databases, virus and access protection and a fully compatible global network and intranet. Regular local ICT-security assessments should assure adequate local applications. External ICT-service providers have been contracted in and are required to report regularly on the measures they are taking to reasonably assure that DSM’s IT processes are not disrupted.

Although DSM has applied strict measures with regard to the security and reliability of its IT systems, incidents regarding for example back-up recovery, hot failover systems, virus attacks and international network connections may still occur, and this can have a material impact on business operations.

Intellectual property protection risks
A certain portion of the company’s financial results is based on (legally) protected intellectual property. When these protection mechanisms expire or do not work properly and the company is unable to follow up these situations appropriately, e.g. through new valuable patents or litigation, there is a risk that the financial results might deteriorate.

Project risks
The company is currently undertaking some major projects whose success is important to the overall business results and exposure. In general these fall into three categories: pricing reinforcement projects, reorganization projects and ICT projects. Apollo is a project that assures uniform application of standard business processes designed in SAP throughout DSM worldwide. 

DSM has extensive experience in project management. It seconds its best people to projects that are considered critical. Moreover, direct Board involvement and monitoring are in place to mitigate the risk of project failure. Projects may nevertheless not always produce the (financial) results projected.

Financial risks
Financial risks additional to the currency, interest and derivative risk mentioned above include commodity risk, credit risk, tax risk and country risk. The major credit rating agencies may change their assessments on DSM creditworthiness, thereby affecting the company’s borrowing capacity and/or the conditions under which it can borrow money and causing fluctuations in the cost of finance. The company aims to keep its single-A credit rating.

The outcomes of ongoing disputes with tax authorities could impact on the company’s tax position with retroactive effect. Although tax assets have been recognized at fair value, future profits may not suffice to realize all tax-loss carry-forwards.

Pension risks
With significant pension obligations in six countries DSM is exposed to volatility in financial markets that can cause changes in future pension costs for the company and in the funded status of the individual pension plans. To reduce these risks the investment policies of the respective pension plans are closely monitored by the company and the investment strategies are aligned to the risk profile of the underlying pension obligations.

Control failures
In our Triple P report some of the control failures are mentioned that occurred in spite of our risk management efforts. They can be found in the section: “What still went wrong”. All failures are extensively analyzed and lessons learnt are implemented.

footer for print stylesheet